Via Web Curios, we are directed towards the US National Security Strategy with foreword by Donald Trump that was published earlier this week to international shock not only of its vision—one praised by Moscow as aligned with Putin’s own world-view—that’s little more than an addendum to the Monroe Doctrine, an isolationist policy demanding that Old World colonial powers stay out of the Americas and a posture focused on cultivating the US’s own regional empire, asserting a right to meddle in the politics of Latin America and taking over territories at the same time, like Cuba and the Panama canal, pretty audacious coming from a former colony only independent for a few decades at the time, and parsing the globe into three spheres of influence, a fantasy map of the United States and client possessions spanning from Greenland and Canada, the isthmus and further south with designs on the Falklands, the Indo-Pacific controlled by China and Europe—perhaps under control of Russia, uncontested and with no incursions upon the sovereignty of these domains, but more over repugnant for the unkindess it has for traditional allies and the US abandoning its commitment to uphold values of democracy and freedom, even if in principle only and not always in practise. “The days of the United States propping up the entire world order like Atlas are over,” the NSS—the document mandated by congress to be periodically updated to provide a common understanding between the executive and legislative branches in terms of strategic priorities and a point of departure for dialogue and something dusted off and updated every other year to satisfy a requirement but never filled with blame and bombast. It identifies only vague and baiting threats like mass-migration, drug-runners, unfettered trade and globalism, echoing JD Vance’s earlier ill-received lecturing during the Munich Security Conference and warning Europe of “cultural erasure” with seemingly American interest in foreign policy to keep neighbours stable to quell refugee-seekers and immigration (questioning if NATO members whose populations are displaced by individuals with non-NATO heritage could be still considered reliable partners) and cites no concrete peril from Russia or China or North Korea and barely acknowledges its recent belligerence of record with bombing Iranian nuclear facilities or sabre-rattling in the Caribbean. Truly a scary read, this paper is only about thirty double-spaced pages in Times New Roman, written by AI and at a basic reading level, so won’t take too much investment but is sure to haunt for a very, very long time.
synchronoptica
one year ago: assorted links to enjoy (with synchronopticรฆ) plus Jimmy who? for president
twelve years ago: a list of winter weather words
thirteen years ago: class architecture
fourteen years ago: visa reciprocity plus Clinton urges world leaders not to censor the internet
fifteen years ago: Mesopotamian dreamtime










